Jul 23, 2009 07:28 pm
Re: Diversion Load Issues
Jon, I'm not disappointed at all. That's why I'm installing a diversion load. More often than not, the red diversion load light is lit, but I have nothing to do with that energy currently. Heating water with it will improve my overall performance from my turbine. My main limiting factor currently is my battery bank, at about 12 kWh capacity (roughly two days of demand). But still, I have no complaints.
My wind (rated 1kW) and solar (rated 0.74kW) components complement each other perfectly. I tend to get more sunlight than wind during the day and during the summer, but every evening, during storms, and throughout the winter, the wind is strong. Since I installed the system, I've always had power in my off-grid house. That includes running well and septic pumps, lights, radio, television, power tools, vacuum cleaners, etc.
I can understand how others might be disappointed though. It's not because of manufacturers, but due to a complete lack of any research on the part of homeowners. I keep seeing these Skystream turbines go up on 30 foot towers lower than nearby tree lines. Of course they're not generating their rated amounts -- there's no wind! My site is on the top of a hill, and I have an 80 foot tower. Wind is generally not a problem. Of course there are still calm periods, but diurnal temperature swings generally ensure at least a few hours of wind per day.
People down in valleys should look to solar or microhydro, especially if they live in tight suburbs. On hills or flat plains, towers should be at least 80 feet unless there are literally no obstructions for like a mile. Turbulence can seriously degrade turbine performance if it's too close to the ground. It really doesn't cost much more to go from 30 feet to 80 feet. A grand or two maybe... but without the height, the whole thing is worthless. And if people bothered to even do a Google search before buying one, they'd know that.