What kind of wind turbine is this?

Posted by Bruce Boatner on October 08, 2008, 12:13:15 AM

Re: What kind of wind turbine is this? (Reply #10)
David,
Thanks for the kind words.  You raise a very interesting point regarding autorotation.  You know, I've never really thought about it in exactly those terms, but in fact you're right.  (BTW I got this idea while studying aerodynamics for my helicopter pilot's exam.) 

Simply put the helicopter puts energy into the air while a wind turbine takes energy out of the air, both via an impeller.  During helicopter autorotation the airfoils are executing a very complex combination of both functions.  Now I'll have some fun thinking about that!

Surprisingly, when I conducted the patent search I found that nobody had previously associated these basic rotor head/VAWT design concepts.  The patent is called "Vertical Axis Wind Turbine With Articulating Rotor", or VAWT/AR for short.  It encompasses both the teetering rotor (2-bladed ala Bell 47/Huey/JetRanger or Robinson R22/44), and fully articulated rotor systems (3+ blades).

The cyclic pitch function on the VAWT/AR is an interaction between the tilt of the overall rotor (which is easily seen in the videos), and the instantaneous Angle Of Attack (AOA) of the airfoils (which is not easy to see).  As Ken Hall rightly observed, this is a type of Cycloturbine, wherein the AOA of the airfoils is constantly being controlled to provide a beneficial lifting force to produce rotation, based on the instantaneous relative wind impinging on the airfoils.  It is reliably self-starting, and has an interesting characteristic of being able to respond to increased loads by increasing torque.

The center of inertia of the entire system is located at a still point at the geometric dead center of the universal joint in the hub.  Thus there is no wobble or vibration at any speed or any rotor tilt angle.

The airfoils are canted in such a manner as to produce lift on two perpendicular axes simultaneously.  There's the normal rotational lift, but also vertical lift created by a fixed angle of the airfoils (pitch bearing housings) mounted relative to the rotor arms.  The lift created in the perpendicular dimension causes a tilting action...which causes the overall rotor to align itself with the wind...which causes the proper AOA to be set for each airfoil...and it's off to the races!

There's no ground effect, but we do need to get the turbine up higher into cleaner wind.  It's convenient right now to make quick adjustments.  In terms of external shrouds etc., one should consider the materials used to construct such are more efficient when "put to work" on the moving sections of the turbine, based on what I've read, anyway.

This all sounds pretty complicated, but today I sent the CNC parts for a new protytpe out for anodizing, and they all fit easily in a fairly small box.  Also the airfoils are a simple NACA 0012 style, like typical symmetrical heli blades, so there's nothing exotic for production.  So there's a relatively complex set of physics being executed by a relatively simple set of mechanics.

And we haven't even talked about how it automatically compensates for gyroscopic precession!  Way too much information, I'll bet...

Cheers,
Bruce
 

Posted by Bruce Boatner on October 08, 2008, 12:24:41 AM

Re: What kind of wind turbine is this? (Reply #11)
Here are the 3 Blackhawk AR-10 videos currently posted on YouTube so you don't have to search for them.  I noticed they don't come up together on the screen when one is played:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4-MuOFl1ts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=878BqVRpYFc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4uYqcVN4To

Cheers,
Bruce
 

Posted by David Ames on October 10, 2008, 07:57:17 PM

Re: What kind of wind turbine is this? (Reply #12)

  hi folks,

 for anyone interested in wind turbines or those folks just interested in interesting things i would recommend having a look at this new wind machine.

 bruce, i looked at the video shot a few more times trying to get my head around the center of rotation.

"The center of inertia of the entire system is located at a still point at the geometric dead center of the universal joint in the hub.  Thus there is no wobble or vibration at any speed or any rotor tilt angle."

  it looks like your universal joint/hub design takes all the side to side loads as well as the thrusting loads into the hub assembly and only lets through the rotational torque to the alternator/generator. nice...that also means it's reasonably easy to swap out different spec generators based on wind resources and power needs?

 i looked up that four digit airfoil. was that 12% by design
or trial and error.

 i hope you can tell us more about your choice for the powerplant as well as the gyroscopic precession correction methods you teased us about.

 all the best.
 

Posted by Bruce Boatner on October 10, 2008, 11:00:43 PM

Re: What kind of wind turbine is this? (Reply #13)
Hi David,
Thanks for your interest. When I read back over my post I thought to myself "Dude, who's going to read all this?".  Obviously you did, so...cheers!

Yes, the U-J only passes the rotational component through to the drive shaft, and maintains all the other forces neutral.  This turbine produces high torque, due to its long moment arms and large swept area, but it turns at a relatively slow RPM.

I tested the turbine without a load to determine the proper cut-in speed and operating range, then I designed a generator to match the aerodynamic characteristics of the rotor.

The AFPMG (Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Generator - really an alternator) starts producing a charging voltage of 25V at a cut-in speed of 40 RPM (0.625 V/RPM) in about a 7-8 MPH wind.  It is designed to operate mostly in the 40 - 60 RPM range but is capable of running at 80 RPM (~ 1KW) without burning out the coils based on the wire gauge I used.  Of course driving a generator to that level of output is quite a challenge indeed!

Having the basic design parameters for the very low RPM generator, it is easy to mod the stator for a 12V or 48V simply by altering the coil wraps and wire size.  The rotor/magnet wheels remain constant.  Also with its low RPM and high torque we've looked into direct mechanical water pumping.

The NACA 0012 was a jumping-off point for experimentation.  We're building a set of 14% airfoils right now.  The airfoils are foam core with thin aluminum sheeting - accurate, strong, light and inexpensive.

Gyroscopic precession - next post!

~bb
 

Posted by Bruce Boatner on October 10, 2008, 11:46:21 PM

Gyroscopic Precession (Reply #14)
Gyroscopic precession seems pretty complex and mysterious at first, but in fact it is simply due to the fact that mass cannot change direction instantly - there is always a delay between the application of force and the movement of the mass.  In the case of a gyroscope, the response to a force is seen 90 degrees after the application of the force.

In other words if you press down at the 12 o'clock position, the clockwise-spinning gyroscope will dip at the 3 o'clock position.  This is simply because the mass passing the 12 o'clock position BEGINS to respond to the force, but it does not reach its full excursion until it reaches the 3 o'clock position.  No mass can respond instantaneously.

In helicopter rotor heads, the desired change to the pitch of the rotating blades must be applied exactly 90 degrees prior to the position that it will take effect.

In the VAWT/AR Tilt Rotor, gyroscopic precession must be compensated for, or the system will not run at its full potential TSR (Tip Speed Ratio - but for a VAWT, rotor speed relative to wind speed).  Here's why:

Let's say there's no wind and the AR is still, with its rotor level.  The wind begins to blow, and the rotor tilts into the wind, causing the airfoils to pitch correctly to produce rotational lift, and the rotor begins to turn.

Now the rotor starts to spin up, faster and faster, and as it does the effects of gyroscopic precession begin to take effect, causing the low tilt point of the rotor, which is supposed to be directly into the wind, to start to drift over to a point 90 degrees to the side. 

If the rotor were allowed to tilt 90 degrees off the windward mark, it would stop running very quickly, because the airfoils would not be positioned correctly to produce lift.  In fact, the airfoil that is swinging directly upwind - that should be perfectly faired into the wind - would start acting like a giant speed brake!

Early prototypes showed that without some means of correcting for gyroscopic precession, the turbines would settle into a tilt angle about 45 degrees between the optimal position and the show-stopper position.  The TSR would then be limited to around 1.5, whereas I've measured a TSR of 3 when correcting for gyroscopic precession.

How the VAWT/AR corrects for this is quite simple.  As I said before, as the rotor tilt angle starts to move away from the optimal windward position, the airfoil swinging in the upwind position begins to present drag because it is not perfectly faired into the wind.  However, due to the fixed cant angle of the airfoil relative to the rotor arm, any non-zero pitch in this airfoil is translated into a lifting force on the rotor arm, thus raising it back into its proper position. 

Remember, though, that gyroscopic precession is acting on this force as well!  But in this case it turns out to work in our favor, the final result of which is to nudge the rotor back into its proper windward tilt position.

So the airfoils are performing triple duty: 1) rotational force (produce rotor torque), 2) tilting force (orient the rotor to produce proper instantaneous airfoil AOA), and 3) correct for gyroscopic precession.  Once again, complex physics, simple design.

Cheers,
Bruce
 
Forums | Design by Scratchmedia | Development by SMF.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer and Disclosure

The Alternative Energy Store, Inc reserves the right, within its sole discretion, to refuse or delete any posting or portion thereof, or terminate or block the access to this forum.

The opinions and statements posted on this forum are the opinions and statements of the person posting same, and do not constitute the opinion or act of the Alternative Energy Store, Inc (AltE). The Alternative Energy Store, Inc does not endorse or subscribe to any particular posting. No posting shall be construed as the act or opinion of the Alternative Energy Store, Inc.

 

top members